Equity Financing: The Accountants’ Perspective

    Becoming an adult it happens to be stated that you can raise investment capital or finance business with either its personal savings, gifts or loans from family and buddies which idea still persist in modern business but most likely in various forms or terminologies.

    It’s a known proven fact that, for companies to grow, it’s prudent that business proprietors tap financial sources and a number of financial sources may be used, generally damaged into two groups, debt and equity.

    Equity financing, to put it simply is raising capital with the purchase of shares within an enterprise i.e. the purchase of the possession interest to boost funds for business purposes using the purchasers from the shares being referred as shareholders. Additionally to voting legal rights, shareholders take advantage of share possession by means of dividends and (hopefully) eventually selling the shares in a profit.

    Debt financing however takes place when a strong raises money for capital or capital expenses by selling bonds, bills or notes to the people and/or institutional investors. To acquire lending the cash, people or institutions become creditors and get a promise the main and interest around the debt is going to be paid back, later.

    A lot of companies use a mix of debt and equity financing, however the Accountant shares a perspective which may be regarded as distinct benefits of equity financing over debt financing. Principal included in this are the truth that equity financing carries no repayment obligation which provides extra capital you can use to develop a company’s business.

    Why go for equity financing?

    • Interest rates are considered a set cost which can raise a company’s break-even point and therefore high interest during difficult financial periods can increase the chance of insolvency. Too highly leveraged (which have considerable amounts of debt when compared with equity) entities for example frequently find it hard to grow due to the very high cost servicing your debt.

    • Equity financing will not place any extra financial burden on the organization because there are no needed monthly obligations connected by using it, hence a business will probably convey more capital available to purchase growing the company.

    • Periodic income is needed for principal and charges and this can be hard for companies with insufficient capital or liquidity challenges.

    • Debt instruments will probably include clauses containing limitations around the company’s activities, stopping management from going after alternative financing options and non-core business possibilities

    • A loan provider is titled simply to repayment from the decided principal from the loan plus interest, and it has to some large extent no direct claim on future profits from the business. If the organization is effective, the proprietors reap a bigger area of the rewards compared to what they would when they had offered debt in the organization to investors to be able to finance the development.

    • The bigger a company’s debt-to-equity ratio, the riskier the organization is recognized as by lenders and investors. Accordingly, a company is restricted regarding the quantity of debt it may carry.

    • The organization is generally needed to pledge assets of the organization towards the lenders as collateral, and proprietors of the organization are in some instances needed to personally guarantee repayment of loan.

    • According to company performance or income, dividends to shareholders might be postpone, however, same isn’t feasible with debt instruments which requires payment whenever they fall due.

    Adverse Implications

    Despite these merits, it will likely be so misleading to consider that equity financing is 100% safe. Think about these

    • Profit discussing i.e. investors expect and deserve some of profit acquired after a financial year similar to the tax man. Business managers who don’t possess the appetite to talk about profits might find this method like a bad decision. It may be a useful trade-if worth of their financing is balanced with the proper acumen and experience, however, this isn’t always the situation.

    • There’s a possible dilution of shareholding or losing control, that is usually the cost to cover equity financing. A significant financing threat to begin-ups.

    • There’s also the opportunity of conflict because sometimes discussing possession and getting to utilize others can lead to some tension as well as conflict should there be variations in vision, management style and methods for running the company.

    • There are many industry and regulatory procedures that will have to be stuck to in raising equity finance making the procedure cumbersome and time intensive.

    • Unlike debt instruments holders, equity holders suffer more tax i.e. on dividends and capital gains (in situation of disposal of shares)

    Decision Cards – Some Possible decision factors for equity financing

    • In case your creditworthiness is a problem, this may be a more sensible choice.

    • If you are much more of a completely independent solo operator, you may be best having a loan without having to share decision-making and control.

    • Can you rather share possession/equity than need to pay back a financial institution loan?

    • Are you currently comfortable discussing making decisions with equity partners?

    • If you’re certain that the company could produce a healthy profit, you may opt to use financing, instead of need to share profits.